Friday, December 09, 2005

Scientific Insight from the Lovely Jennifer

There was a great John Wright article published by the Standard-Examiner a couple of days ago regarding the lingering "gondola" issue. For unknown reasons, the "Lift Ogden" folks spent thousands of dollars in the early days of the Ogden Municipal elections... Apparently trying to confuse the election issues... And trying to bring the "excitement" of their "pet" issue to the fore.

They even spent $10,000 sending out this total POS promotional brochure.

It seems that a WSU Econ class has released some significant research this week, using the best mathematical quantitative analysis techniques available.

They've "scientifically" quantified the impressions of Ogdenites re a publicly-supported gondola... even after the "full-tilt "Lift Ogden Gondola autumn PR Blitz.

John Wright reports their findings, and they seem pretty clear. Ogdenites are "unexited" about a publicly-funded gondola, and are unwilling to spend significant public moneys on such a project.

Despite the two straight months of Lift Ogden hype and hoopla, Ogdenites think it's a crock of "you know what."

The uber-tiny personal validation-needy Napoleon-sized farmboy from Harrisville on nine however sez the results of this poll are not "scientific."

In that connection, here's the text of an email I received re this from "the lovely Jennifer," a regular WCF gentle reader, and a math and econ major @ our home-town WSU:

Okay, you have Mr. God-free saying he thinks the survey was premature. He is quoted as saying "You're asking people to give you feedback when they don't have enough information," Godfrey said, "I think they're well-intentioned, but it's certainly not going to be a scientific poll."

First, what about the pamphlet circulated a while ago,and numerous articles and such in the Standard about the project? Heck, even my son in high school knows about the Gondola project - Going up to Weber State, then to Snow Basin (his words).

Second, saying the survey project was certainly unscientific could not be further from the truth. I have had the same course, taught by the same professor (and chair of the Economics Dept at WSU), and the WHOLE COURSE is all about learning how to scientifically, statistically, analytically evaluate economic choices and outcomes. Econometrics is the name of the course, and it is defined as "Application of mathematical and statistical techniques to economics in the study of problems, the analysis of data, and the development and testing of theories and models." (dictionary.com) What could be more scientific than that? And in case anybody is wondering - Economics is the study of the choices people make. So, conducting a survey among people about a choice that is in front of them is indeed scientifically justified in an economic sense.

How's that?

The Lovely Jennifer.
"Nuff said," I think.

A state-of-art Weber State University economics department class-assignment poll confirms what I already learned anecdotally, while walking precincts in Oct-Nov:

Ogden people are NOT excited by the heavily-touted "Gondola Vision."

Perhaps Ex-Utah legislator Allen and his dimwit neoCON son-in-law might want to take their whole friggin' publicly-supported "Gondola Vision" back to the drawing board.

"Unscientific" my ass.

Comments, please.

This board is all about reader comments.

And my hearty thanks to the Lovely Jennifer for her comments.

© 2005 - 2014 Weber County Forum™ -- All Rights Reserved