Sunday, September 09, 2007

Lurching From Mindless Fluffery to Near Excellence

Bits and pieces from the Sunday Standard-Examiner

By Curmudgeon

The morning's Standard-Examiner provides a fine example of the paper's exasperating inconsistency, its wild swings between competence and mind-numbing fluffery within the pages of the same issue.

Let's start with the good: There is a very interesting story by Joe Frazier headlined "Streetcars helping revive downtowns". Of course, it's a wire service story, not one by Std-Ex staff, but still, the editors get some chops for running it. Here are a few excerpts:

But they are making a comeback in several American cities, and more have plans in the wings, projects largely development-driven to revitalize sagging urban areas, and to serve a population segment, often baby boomers, choosing to move back to the cities and to simplify their lives when they do....
Most newer lines are less than five miles long, but transit officials in cities such as Portland, Little Rock, Tampa, Kenosha, Wis., Tacoma, Wash., and elsewhere, said they are making a difference in rejuvenating sagging urban areas. Charles Hales, senior vice president of the engineering firm HDR, which works on many streetcar projects, says as many as 60 American cities are in some stage of streetcar planning or development, “depending on how you count it....”
The new lines no longer are the commuter systems they once were. They are designed to lure people back into cities, keep them there, and perk up decaying, underused, and undertaxed, former industrial sites and similar areas. And it seems to be working.
Portland has seen about $2.5 billion in new construction, including 7,248 new housing units within three blocks of the line since the plan was announced in 1997.
In Little Rock, Ark., the figure is between $300 million and $400 million. “It is not the only reason (for the construction) but most developers admit the streetcar is one of the reasons,” said Keith Jones, who helped design the system there. “The line defines areas where things in the city are happening....”
Sixty cities, depending, on track [yes, pun intended] to revive downtowns via street car transit. But not Ogden, of course, because out Mayor, still in the grip of his weird flatland gondola delusion has prevented and is continuing to block the steps needed to start Ogden on the same path. Frazier's story is well worth the time.

Now for the not so good. The lead story in the Std-Ex this morning, by Mr. Schwebke, top of the front page, big headline, is this: "Ogden Hopefuls Confident." Here's the story's lead paragraph:

OGDEN — With just a couple of campaign days left, five mayoral candidates are confident they will cruise to victory in Tuesday’s primary election.

Then it goes on to quote each and every one of the five about how the voters are for them and they are confident of going through to victory in primary. [Well, four of the five anyway. I'm not quite sure what candidate Thompson told Mr. Schwebke: Thompson... is taking a decidedly low-key approach to the primary. He hasn’t actively campaigned. “I don’t go door-to-door,” he said. “I don’t introduce myself as running for mayor. People in my neighborhood wish me well, ask for a (campaign) sign, and might say they are voting for me. Not once, either knowing me or out of the blue, has anyone ever brought up issues or problems either for me or in regard to the city.”

Ah... ok. I guess. [English translations of what Mr. Thompson said would be gratefully received.]

The whole story is boilerplate pablum fluffery as far as election coverage goes. All the candidates are confident of victory two days from the vote. No! Stop the presses! Alert the media! Ranks right up there with "College of Cardinals Choose Catholic As Next Pope" or "Sun To Rise In East, Scientists Say!" Candidates confident of victory is the lead story in the paper, and the lead political story, two days before an election? Unbelievable.

Mr. Schwebke, by the way, has a much better article, also on the front page, headlined "Huntsville Tax Revolt Over Property Assessments".

Then, back to the good again, there's an interesting and thoughtful editorial headlined "The Fears of Poverty" on the editorial page.

It's the inconsistency of the Std-Ex that drives a newspaper junkie like me to distraction, the seemingly random lurches from the mindless fluffery of Candidates Confident of Victory to the substantive good work of Tax Revolt in Eden to, occasionally, excellence. No one can do excellent work every time all the time. But certainly Std-Ex readers can reasonably expect competent substantive work consistently, and not be subjected to the embarrassment of their home town daily making the lead story on a Sunday morning of election week "Candidates Confident of Victory."

Sigh....

Update 9/9/07 3:44 p.m. MT: We have an interesting discussion brewing in the lower comments section regarding this morning's Charlie Trentleman article, which bears signs of having been hacked to pieces, prior to this morning's publication. Have a look at it yourselves, gentle readers, and feel free to comment on whether this airy piece seems congruent with Mr. Trentelman's normally logical, internally consistent and polished work product. Frankly, we have our doubts. It appears to be a re-write to us.

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

I truly enjoyed Trentelman's column this morning.

Way to "stick it to the Man," Charlie!

For my part, I believe your bosses at the S-E strongly encouraged you to write this column.

I think they are extremely interested in being a hard-hitting, probing newspaper.

I mean, look at headlines like "Ogden Hopefuls Confident". You can't get much harder-hitting than that, and on the front page, to boot.

I'm still a little confused about whether the mayoral candidates are hopeful or confident, but I'm sure we'll sort that out by Tuesday.

Anonymous said...

Mono:

I don't think anyone orders Mr. Trentelman what to write in his column. I imagine editors may tell him occasionally that they won't run a particular column, but I don't think they order him to include content or to make a particular POV his POV.

By the way, refusing to print one of her columns is what made Holly Mullen jump ship at the Salt Lake Trib. She'd done one on a national issue, the editors refused to run it, insisting she limit her column to local matters and she resigned.

Worked out OK. She landed at The Salt Lake Weekly which seems a better fit for her anyway. She's with the paper that does the best investigative journalism in the state, week in and week out.

Anonymous said...

Trentelman: "I have this fun mental image of the campaign-sign fairy, flitting on gold wings, swinging a hammer."

Yep, that's my Bobby, the campaign-sign fairy!

Anonymous said...

Dirty Deeds in Delco, Done Dirt Cheap

Anonymous said...

Seemed to me that the paper gave Godfrey a lot more press in the article "Ogden Hopefuls Confident" (number of words) than they did the other candidates.

Why wasn't there more opportunity given, or at least an effort made by the paper, to print the other candidates position on issues effect the residents?

I'm tired of the paper pumping up Godfrey (and letting him take credit for anything and everything that takes place in the city whether he had anything to do with it or not) while marginalizing the other candidates.

The paper should provide more info as to what the other candidates plan on doing for the city, not just one liners.

Anonymous said...

If nothing else puts the Standard's incompetence into the spotlight, then a comparison between it and the Salt Lake papers sure does.

This morning's Tribune for instance has their main headline and lead article about the Salt Lake mayor primary and the contenders. It follows up inside with four full pages on the subject. Lots of details about the candidates and their positions. This follows up many days worth of extensive coverage on the candidates in the mayoral race there.

The current edition of the City Weekly has a full page cover and six page coverage of the SL mayor race.

The Standard (or SubStandard) matches that with this insipid little piece-O-shit piece by Schwepke!

So tell us once again Mr. Curmudgeon how the Standard really is a pretty good paper underneath their incompetence. (yes, I know your piece today didn't say that, but this has been your mantra in general for some time now)

I believe Abe Glasmann would be totally mortified by what these suits of Sandusky have done to his once great newspaper. They turned into an unispired second rate advertising circular.

Anonymous said...

Curm:

Sorry, I was trying to pick up on the tone of Trentelman's column and missed.

I was afraid of that.

Somewhere in the cut and paste, we lost my italics, which were meant as a sort of "red flag of sarcasm". Or maybe a black flag, not sure right now.

Just as Mr. Trentelman trust that Booby Godfrey is "straightening" lawn signs, I trust that the S-E is engaging in hard-hitting local journalism.

Interestingly, there's a column by the "Public Editor" in today's New York Times that explains why the Times will not call Alberto Gonzales a liar. I don't know if the link will work with non-subscribers, but I've included it anyhow.

OgdenLover said...

Curm,
I think Monotreme was being sarcastic about the SE's encouraging Trentelman to write the sign-stealing article.

Let's not overlook the great Letter to the Editor from Catherine Gerwels in today's issue. Ogden Needs Mayor who Listens to the People

Anonymous said...

Bonnie Lee:

Too be fair, let us also remember that the SL Trib has a much much larger customer base, sells a ton more inches of ad space, and therefore can print pages and pages of election coverage. The SE couldn't afford to do that much.

Which does not in any way explain why the lead campaign article today was the vapid "Candidates Confident of Victory." First of all, it's not true [unless some of them are fools] that all of them are confident of victory. And second, what would a candidate be expected to day four days before the vote? "Jeez, I'm really pessimistic about my campaign. I figure I'm going to get my head handed to me on Tuesday."

I wish one of them had. That at least would have been news.

Anonymous said...

Mono and Ogdenlover:

Ah, of course. Sorry I missed the irony. Sometimes [as I've learned the hard way] what is normally conveyed by tone of voice doesn't always carry over into print. My apologies for the misreading.

BTW, I owe you two a thanks. Went to a movie at the Point Theaters this morning. [I've lived here five and a half years, passed that corner I don't know how many times, and never noticed it was there.] Saw a film not playing elsewhere ["Stardust"], paid [for two of us] a buck fifty less than the Mall theaters were charging, and got my small plain popcorn for less than the Mall theaters want. Will check the Pointe's offering from now on when movie shopping. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Curm, the Pointe Theaters are great. I much prefer the Pointe and the North Pointe (same owners) over the mall theater. People that usually go to these ones are much classier and respectful of everyone else. I can't stand the idiots that have to talk through movies or bring their unruly kids. I don't mind kids being there (have a couple myself) just keep them in better control.

But, more than the Pointe Theaters I like to go to the Walker Theaters in Perry. Short drive north, but well worth it in my opinion. Cheaper admission. Good popcorn. Better atmosphere. Plus as a bonus in the summer you get to stop at the great fruit stands along the way. Another bonus is that it is next to Maddox Restaurant.

Anonymous said...

Is anyone else nonplussed, even puzzled, by Trentlemen's column? Yeah, when it opened, I thought he was making fun of Short-deck, and how he believed him, and I believe that gondolas turn "dying" communities into "meccas." But then I finished reading and I wanted to kick him [the writer] in the balls. Again, another example of the Stand-Ex being the most pussy, one-sided pile of editorial crap because its new publisher, Lee Carter, is a bona fide Squirrel Patroller and he makes Dean Singleton look like Katherine Graham! Like you, Captain Bob! of Wayne Peterson's famed Squirrel Patrol! What drives these miracles of men? Gondolas! What makes Squirrels run ragged with fear? Gondolas!). Sensible people should tell the Stand-Ex to choke on it and move their subscriptions elsewhere. THE SKI IS BEAUTIFUL BLUE.
P.S. Trentlemen: that was a pile; your worst ever. File it.

Anonymous said...

Jason:

I actually enjoyed it a great deal. My interpretation is that there was no way the S-E was covering this story, so Trentelman slipped it into the paper by the use of sarcasm.

If anyone challenges him, he can say, "I said I believed Booby Geiger" and it's a legally-defensible position. No libel or defamation there.

Which, I suspect, is what the S-E is afraid of.

Anonymous said...

Dear Mono:
You are certainly more intelligent than I am, and will oftentimes defer to your raison-d'-etre, except in cases where I will falsely conject that I have considerable more expertise, such as column writing; Trentlemen's piece was a jaw-droppingly bad example of satire gone awry and middling editorial pussiness; the Stand-Ex allowed it due to its deficiencies and, I suspect, it was watered down. Geiger is a piker and nobody believes his horseshit story. The Stand-Ex, on the other hand, won't allow anyone to write that, because their publisher is a member of Wayne Peterson's famed Squirrel Patrol. He is, and that column could have been funny, but it sucked. It sucked gondolas.

Anonymous said...

Oh, and one other thing (you too, Rudi): compound adjectives beginning with adverbs are not hyphenated.

RudiZink said...

Thanks, Jason. We concede we need to refer a little more frequently to that style manual that lies buried somewhere in our thousands of Weber County Forum bookmarks.

Anonymous said...

I think Trentleman was off his feed today. If he was going for "tongue-in-cheek" irony, than he needs a longer tongue or a deeper cheek.

Shame on him for not nailing the brat when he's obviously read the police report detailing his stealing of Hansen's sign.

These acts of vandalism AND trespassing whould be reported by this rag.

Anonymous said...

Jason:

Yeah, I always do that. Thanks for the correction.

Anonymous said...

Sharon:

Mr. Trentelman thinks yard signs are silly. He said so, as I recall, during the days when SGO and Lift Ogden were distributing signs [before Lift Ogden surrendered the field].

I think he's wrong about that. Sometimes yard signs are the only inexpensive [relatively] way for people not in office and not sitting on tons of cash to become visible on a matter of disputed public policy. Sometimes.

But Trentelman's been consistent over a long time in his opinions about yard signs per se. He thinks they're largely irrelevant to ... well, to anything that matters much. His views on them are not specific to this election or to the Great Geiger Sign Caper.

Anonymous said...

Bonnie Lee:

BTW, the SL Trib has its critics too. For an example, check out the latest posting at Voice of Utah which takes after the Trib for playing favorites in its news columns or for shilling for a favored advertiser [I'm not sure which] while screwing up its crime coverage.

Anonymous said...

I got up this morning and all my signs were gone, and my neighbor's were too. But as I got to church, I noticed a Godfrey supporter's signs were gone also.

There at the church, behind the bushes, was a pile of signs, mostly VanHoosers and Godfreys.

My wife felt that the Godfrey people stole the signs, and threw some unused and unwanted Godfrey signs in to the pile to make it look even.

But all my signs and the neighbor's were back up in minutes, so whoever it was that stole them wasted his time.

And for what it's worth both my neighbors and I liked Trentleman's editorial. I felt it was nice piece of satire that raised the issue in a way that doesn't specifically accuse anyone. (And as far as I know, nobody's been charged yet, so . . . .) In fact, I thought it was one of Trentleman's best moments.

And I appreciate the paper reinforcing the idea that there is an election this Tuesday. This is it folks. You can talk all you want, but voting is what it all comes down to. These things are decided at the polls. So vote, and get everyone you know to vote this Tuesday.

Anonymous said...

I think it is a traversity of justice that our own little lord Godfrey should be subjected to the evil treatment the ungratefull people of Ogden are heaping upon his great and broad shoulders.

You should all just fall to your knees and kiss the hem of his garments in thanks for the transformation he has single handidly created in this ingrate town that is not near good enough for him.

Before his highness came to Ogden it was wallowing in dispair and ruin. Crime was rampant, there was no public safety to be had, and favortism was unheard of. Every single thing that makes life bearable in this town was created by his magnificance. The sun itself didn't even care to shine on Ogden before he graced our presense.

You should all bow down and demand the election be cancelled and a coronation be held instead.

Hail to the new Sun King.

Anonymous said...

bow down and kiss his ring, because he is the king.

Anonymous said...

Lying Little Matty Godfrey is so full of hubris, as I discovered campaigning yesterday, that he LECTURES his constituents about how all the godd he does will improve the entire town, and that he and the two community-saviorian, onion-reeking Geigers (with four employees) will build a new and great Utopia based on gondolas and the eradication of Squirrels!
THE SKI IS BEAUTIFUL BLUE.

Anonymous said...

Just wanted to say some words to the five term Utah State Representative Neil Hansen.

Thank you for your service and all you’ve done for us cops and firefighters.

I really hope you win the primary for Mayor.

I know we’ll never be able to repay you for your service but we can try by voting for you. I know you’ll continue to be our voice and understand that we only want to protect our community and I know you do too. I want to continue our partnership; especially on the City Level.

God Bless and good luck Tuesday.

Anonymous said...

Just A Cop:

Nicely put. Proven performance matters. A lot.

Anonymous said...

Thanks Curm

Post a Comment

© 2005 - 2014 Weber County Forum™ -- All Rights Reserved