For those readers who may have not been following the RSL stadium story closely, we offer this quick and dirty fact summary, courtesy of the ever-useful Wikipedia:
In 2005 a soccer-specific stadium for the team was approved for Sandy, a suburb of Salt Lake City. However, funding for the stadium was still hard to come by. A vote in early 2006 struck down a funding proposal for the stadium. However, Tom Dolan, the mayor of Sandy, said that he would not give up on his fight to approve the proposal in Sandy. The funding plan was revised, but was struck down later in 2006 over disagreements in the appropriation of millions of hotel-tax dollars for a financially unproven sports franchise. The proposal for Sandy was declared "dead" by [RSL owner Dave]Checketts at that point, putting the team's future in doubt. Dave Checketts said that he wanted the team to remain in Utah, but would sell it if a proposal was not put forward by August 12, 2006. Parties from several cities, including Rochester, New York and Saint Louis, Missouri, expressed interest in purchasing the franchise and moving it. Other stadium sites in the area were also proposed, including the Utah State Fairgrounds in Salt Lake, and the tiny town of Vineyard, just west of Provo. Finally, on the very day Checketts had set as a deadline to have a stadium plan in place or decide to sell the team, and after months of up and down discussions with local municipalities, county, and state officials and a change in the funding structure, a tacit agreement between Checkets, Sandy City, and Salt Lake County was put in place, and Real Salt Lake announced that they would move forward with the construction of the Sandy Stadium.In the course of reaching this agreement, each of the above public and private stakeholder entities agreed to make substantial capital contributions toward this project, including a $100 million investment pledge from Dave Checketts.
Our reader suggests that this project shares many similarities with our situation in Weber County, wherein our own Emerald City Mayor [Boss Godfrey] has worked feverishly to promote his own pet project [the Peterson Landgrab,] toward which public AND private entities have at least vaguely suggested a commitment of substantial capital resources -- $500 million, in the case of Mr. Peterson.
In the RSL stadium instance however, our reader suggests, the prudent behavior of fiscally conservative Salt Lake County Mayor Pete Coroon stands in stark contrast to that of our own project-driven and non risk-averse Matthew Godfrey:
As the furor over Utah's proposed Major League Soccer stadium fades, one financial mystery remains: Does Real Salt Lake really have the cash?Read the SL Trib story. Decide for yourselves. Isn't it time that somebody asked Mr. Peterson to "Show us the money," our gentle reader earnestly asks. Isn't it about time that somebody checked out Mr. Peterson's financial credentials? And what about a business plan? Howcome nobody's asked for that? Our city government is already stumbling over itself to amend our planning and zoning scheme as some bizarre gesture of "good faith," notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Peterson hasn't as yet even so much as put a real proposal on the table.
Peter Corroon, the fiscally conservative Salt Lake County mayor, is determined to find out.
Corroon has called on the District Attorney's Office to convene the county's strict Debt Review Committee to scrutinize all things RSL. Within 30 days, the mayor wants to see the team's money, including RSL's investment partners, financial history and comprehensive business plan.
"We want to know about the stadium - how it's being financed, who the investors are - to make sure the team is viable," Corroon said Wednesday. "I'd like to know myself whether we're going to go forward or not."
We're throwing this out for today's discussion, while your humble blogmeister tinkers with a new website that will be soon added as a Weber County Forum feature. You can discuss this issue, or whatever tickles your fancy. Feel free to use this space as an open thread.
Who will be the first to comment?
11 comments:
Can we (Ogden) trade SL County for their Mayor? Please...
Mayor Coroon want to see the money!
Ain't no way he and Godfrey are on the same planet, much less in Emerald City. I've been asking for Peterson to show us his money, his investors, ANY solid indication that he can do anything besides grab our land!
Don't forget that YOUR 'lustrous potentate told Rep. Neil Hansen, (out of the crowd's earshot), that the "Mount Ogden Course and parkland goes to the 'person with the smartest plan'"
How smart is that? Oh, there's trouble in Ogden City!!
could it be true that chris peterson is the mayors poster child for goverment welfare? I knew that this was going on all over the place but now we in ogden have our very own poster child! I guess that is why the mayor puts his project on the city's web page.
can we be ever so lucky to have our own now! vote for Chris peterson as the city's best poster boy!!!
In addition to Godfrey we could also through in Mark Johnson and Bill Glassman to sweeten the deal... Any takers?
Caril, here
People think they can build a city with sports. Maybe they can. However, local artists are building Ogden as we speak about what's wrong with our hometown. Thursday-Sunday, WSU is hosting the 16th Conference of the International Association of Hispanic Women Writers. There is a free movie at the Egyptian Wednesday at 7:30 that's part of this conference. Conference attendees from around the world will find Ogden's First Friday Art Stroll a pleasurable way to see downtown and they'll enjoy the Farmer's Market on Saturday morning. A family friendly musical comedy is opening Friday at WSU, with a matinee on Saturday so you don't have to keep the kids up late. There is music and art everywhere. Come downtown, welcome our international visitors and greet your neighbors. Share it with your friends, your kids, enjoy it by yourself. There is more than one way to look at Ogden. Be sure to enjoy what it has to offer.
Anyone else notice the planning commission agenda for this Wednesday, October 6th? Perhaps I'm paranoid, but two items that could sound remarkably like the no-zone zone that Peterson wants are listed.
8:10 PM 10. Public Hearing: Proposal to Revise Zoning Ordinance, regarding conditions and development of Sensitve lands and required studies. Continued to November 1, no discussion.
8:40 PM 11. Public Hearing: Proposal to Amend Zoning Ordinance, regarding amendments to mixed use overlay zone and creation of ordinance to allow mixed uses and village center zoning. Continued to November 1, no discussion.
Once again, why does this all have to be so cryptic? Why aren't items described so that the public knows what is being considered? I was out of town a few weeks ago and glanced at the local newspaper. Items up for discussion were listed in the paper with maps showing exactly the area under consideration.
To all the Anonymous-es / Anonymi out there -
When I first wrote to this list, I didn't want to be identifiable and I didn't want to have to establish my own weblog, so I was one of you, posting as "Anonymous too". I then discovered that I could post as a blogger setting up only a Username and Password.
That's all there is to it.
Comments posted by one anon can be attributed to another anon quite easily, and the point of your cumulative arguments is diluted.
Throw the Republicans out!
They don’t know how to get things. They only know to give themselves pay increases and raid the tax funds to give to their buddies. Stop them in November.
Vote Democratic!
anon/caril-
i definitely enjoy what we have here in ogden, it is a great town with much potential. that is what i would like to protect and build upon. further, the ogden that i enjoy is threatened by a mayor and others who have an insane vision of what we should be.
There is definitely movement toward signing the pre-development agreement, Ogdenlover, but I do not know whether these planning commission items are part of it.
I am amazed that they would even consider signing it with none of the usual due diligence---feasibility studies, etc., in place. Were I on the council, I would want a report from zoning about all the codes in force in that area, including but not limited to what they are and why they are there. At the very least. To enable me to know what the city was about to sign away with the signing of this pre-development agreement.
And regarding the subject of this thread, the show us the money part, I really do agree with this. As we recall, Representative Neil Hansen tried to get a bill passed last year that stated that anyone doing business with the city in this manner had to open their books for review. From what I heard, other lawmakers were puzzled at the need for such a bill. Well, now they should know.
I think it might be resurrected this year--we should keep an eye out for it. The passage of one like that might change the Peterson proposal considerably.
I have attended the Council meeting and have a report, but the Blogmeister seems to be unavailable. Should this go on too long, I am considering just posting the report on this thread.
Okay, let's try that web link again for "Waiting for the Gondola"
Waiting for the Gondola
New comments are not allowed.