As a followup to our earlier reporting on the subject, we'll cast the spotlight on a couple of morning stories from the Deseret News and the Tribune, which confirm that, true to their threat, The Utah Republican party has indeed filed its lawsuit, implementing the GOP strategy which we'll henceforth lovingly refer to as the "SB54 GOP bait&switch":
The Utah Republican Party has filed a lawsuit against the state, alleging that changes enacted during the past legislative session to the way nominees are chosen for office violate the party's constitutional rights.Check out the full stories here, peeps:
"[The change] violates the party's constitutional right to free association and infringes on its rights to free speech and due process, its ability to control its own brand and message, and its authority over its endorsement, name, and emblems," argues a lawsuit filed in federal court by the GOP over the weekend.
The party is asking a federal judge to strike down SB54, which enacted the changes.
- Utah GOP sues state over changes to candidate selection process
- Utah GOP sues state to invalidate Count My Vote changes
Here are the plaintiff's "causes of action" in a nutshell, folks, laid out count-by-count:
- For Declaratory Relief Establishing The Unconstitutionality of SB54 For Violating The Party’s Rights
- For Injunctive Relief To Prevent The Deprivation Of Plaintiff’s Constitutional Rights
- Trademark Infringement
No wonder the GOP party bosses are so "royally pissed off"
And lest you might leap to the conclusion that Chairman Evans and his ilk are behaving like "anti-democratic tyrants," remember; these GOP "party elites" are merely resorting to the courts for your own good. By denying you the right to directly participate in the Utah political nominations process, and by clinging to their precious "insider-driven" caucus/convention system, they're merely attempting to protect you lumpen Utah "sheeple" from yourselves, after all, right?
We'll keep you all posted as this case develops, and will keep our eyes peeled for the State of Utah's responsive pleading, once it pops up on the "interwebs," of course.
1 comment:
Was any legislative analysis presented on this bill by any of the legislatures lawyers or the Attorney Generals office on the legality of the bill?
Post a Comment