Tuesday, September 20, 2005

This Will Be On the Test

Just for fun, I thought I'd present our gentle readers with a set of locally-operative facts, just to test the reasoning skills of our Weber County Forum readership:

  • Earl Holding's Sinclair Oil is the owner of Snow Basin, on the eastern slope of Mt. Ogden;
  • Chris Peterson (Earl Holding's son-in-law) has purchased the entire historic Malan Family property on the west side of Mt. Ogden, running from the top of Mt. Ogden, to the eastern border of Ogden city's Mt. Ogden Golf course;
  • Mr. Peterson has announced he'll build a four-season resort (including a modest ski hill,) and a gondola to link from the vicinity of the Weber State University campus to upper Malan's basin;
  • A local community activist group, "Lift Ogden," supports the Peterson venture, and touts a second gondola system, linking the Ogden Intermodal transit hub to the vicinity of the lower Malan's Basin gondola terminal; They've spent thousands of dollars hyping the project and trying to generate general public support;
  • There's gossip circulated about a mysterious giant hotelier who'll build a $200 million luxury hotel in Ogden, conditionally, upon construction of the Downtown-WSU lower gondola leg;
  • Earl Holding's Sinclair Oil happens to be deeply involved in the luxury hotel business;
  • Lift Ogden and other gondola promoters campaign briefly to sell the lower leg as a legitimate public-funding-eligible public transit alternative, then suddenly back down, and admit the lower leg is intended mainly to transport tourists from the soon-to-be-constructed downtown hotel to the bottom of the Malan's Basin Gondola. In a complete turnabout, gondola promoters then confidently announce last week that all the subject projects - both gondolas, and the hotel -- will be entirely privately-funded.
  • There's an election coming up in two weeks, and the local newspaper of record, the slavishly pro-city administration Standard-Examiner is starkly silent on election issues about which Ogden's citizenry is all abuzz. While Ogden citizens are talking about throwing out a couple of city council incumbents, the best the Standard-Examiner can do is publish a few puff pieces about various downtown projects which, although floundering, "aren't as bad as they were a couple of months ago."
Those are the facts, gentle readers, as have been reported in the local media. Having examined these facts, can we draw any reasonable inferences from the so-far reported facts? Taking this set of assumed facts into consideration, are there any reasonable inferences about whom this mysterious "hotelier" may be? And what about these private funds which will be expended to build-out these projects? Do the facts provide sufficient information to reasonably infer the true identity of this mysterious financier?

And if this secretive character is indeed the multi-billionaire Earl Holding, (which is my tentative conclusion at this point,) why the cat-and-mouse game? Has Mr. Holding kept his cards under the table so far, just to test the public's tolerance for contributing public money?

And if indeed a "private deal" has now been struck, why aren't the City Administration and the "Lift Ogden" folks already crowing about it? This is much bigger than the Scott USA deal, and the Ogden city administration didn't skip a beat in taking immediate credit when that old-guard recreation manufacturer announced its relocation to its new Ogden city site. Mr. Holding would be deserving of a ticker-tape parade, as far as I'm concerned, if he's willing to carry out these grand plans on his own dime. Mayor Godfrey could even ride along with him, smiling and waving from the back seat of Mr. Holding's open Mercedes-Benz stretch convertible.

Could the delay in the announcement be have some other purpose perhaps? Remember there's an election coming up, and many of the Ogden city townsfolk are salivating to roll some council incumbent heads. Could it be that the Ogden city administration has borrowed a page from the national political play-book and crafted a means to suddenly rehabilitate the current city council's sagging credibility?

Is there an October surprise in store?

Am I the only one who's connected the dots?

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Vote out the incumbents and things should be just fine.

faithanddustin said...

There's no conspiracy theory here.

Anonymous said...

How'd this guy get back on?

RudiZink said...

I didn't say anything about conspiracies, UTmorMAN...

It's more like smart poker playing that I suspect may be happening here.

Just a "heads-up" for our more naive and politically inexperienced gentle readers, that's all.

And Mr. President: Your handle is banned for life from this forum. Perhaps you ought to pick another one...

Anonymous said...

It's more like smart poker playing that I suspect may be happening here.

You said a mouthful there, Rudi. Nice gambling analogy.

faithanddustin said...

If there were some type of game going on here, the SE would have at least had a reporter at the meeting last week rather than have commented on it five days later. It seems like the bulk of the talk is going on online. My suggestion would be to talk more about the candidates and such.

faithanddustin said...

I sit in on the meetings and there's been no talk of political motives, etc., nor has there been political figures there recently (excluding last Tuesday's group meeting).

Anonymous said...

Nice job, Bob G. You're to be commended for not disclosing the principals. Most often, those in the big leagues, or those with basic business smarts, don't want disclosure until they make the call.

Earl did take a public beating over the Snow Basin road. Good business move there, but it did bring the rath, and to some point jusifiable in some people's regards, over it. Land swaps, gov't dollars, the road. Interesting to see how long he stays an observor in this, if in fact he is one.

The mountain leg seems to be gaining some support. The downtown leg has many questions yet to answer. Again, one step at a time. Too many Wreck Centers out there now from ill planning and not taking the public input at face value.

But, as previously stated, pretty good clarification post, although I suspect you'll take your usual beating from a few.

Keep positive and consider everything everyone says. This ski town concept might be a cool undertaking. Much to be gained if donw right, by the private sector.

RudiZink said...

Enthused citizen: "I suspect you'll take your usual beating from a few."

There will be NO verbal beatings delivered here. Bob G. is my invited guest, and I won't allow trollish cheap-shots here.

None. nada, zero. zip.

Period.

This board is for civilized adults who know how to behave in public, and obey the system of customary "manners" that their mommies aparently failed to teach them.

faithanddustin said...

I'll serve as a witness here. It was known months ago that Scott was coming here.

Anonymous said...

As it should be, Rudi....thank you!

Anonymous said...

Great posts Gieger. 220 million dollar hotel is enough of a reason to build the downtown leg, but it remains only 2% of the pie. The vision is great and future bright for Ogden, and we will have the last laugh at our neighbors to the south. They don't have anything that can touch this. So come on everyone were all going to vote for Mitch Moyes right! WRONG!

Anonymous said...

Rudi,

Great information, there are many out there that may not know who all these names are. Also, you are right, The Standard Examiner is not putting much information out about the candidates. I assume the reason is simply there are too many candidates to really cover effectively. This is why I really appreciate the forum you have worked do hard to build and cultivate. It's difficult right now to be a non-incumbant getting the word out. I will tell you, there are many voters that aren't exactly thrilled with the lack of LEADERSHIP on the current council, and I suspenct this will be reflective on OCT 4, and NOV 8. Thanks for allowing voters and candidates to connect!

Anonymous said...

Rudizink,
Your post invoked some thought. I fear, however that you have lost sight of the big picture. I think that you are reading into this whole thing just a little too much.
Perhaps your Negative undertone on the current Ogden City Administration has left you examining the situation to the point where reality has been distorted.

RudiZink said...

Nonsense, Johnny. It's logical speculation, based on the available public information.

My theories can't be ruled out, without more information.

And I don't understand what you mean by "negative."

Where did I say any of this was bad?

And as far as the gondola plan goes; I'm onboard the bandwagon now that I'm informed that the taxpayers won't be called upon to foot the bill.

As for the politics, perhaps you need to upgrade your views from what you learned in high-school civics. Politics is a game of strategy, just like poker. It's neither "good" nor "bad."

Anonymous said...

Rudizink,
The simple fact that you are on board for the Gondola project is enough for me. I will not continue my argument. I have a strong optimism for the project
myself, and feel that it will be one major step forward for OGDEN.

© 2005 - 2014 Weber County Forum™ -- All Rights Reserved